Fix process_result locking by acquiring in process_wait as well to prevent freeing memory too early

This commit is contained in:
2024-11-08 10:50:10 +00:00
parent 84fe637c7e
commit 6ed1ccd21e
3 changed files with 28 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@@ -647,6 +647,7 @@ init_process_result (struct thread *t)
struct process_result *result = malloc (sizeof (struct process_result));
result->tid = t->tid;
result->exit_status = t->exit_status;
lock_init (&result->lock);
sema_init (&result->sema, 0);
t->result = result;
}

View File

@@ -34,9 +34,10 @@ typedef int tid_t;
/* A process result, synchronised between parent and child. */
struct process_result
{
tid_t tid; /* The tid of the child process. */
int exit_status; /* The exit status of the child process. Initially set to
-1, then to exit_status when child dies. */
tid_t tid; /* The tid of the child process. */
int exit_status; /* The exit status of the child process. Initially set
to -1, then to exit_status when child dies. */
struct lock lock; /* Lock the exit_status and sema. */
struct semaphore sema; /* Semaphore to signal the parent that the exit_status
has been set. */
struct list_elem elem; /* List element for the parent's children list. */

View File

@@ -224,11 +224,16 @@ process_wait (tid_t child_tid UNUSED)
return -1;
/* Wait for child to die. */
sema_down (&child_result->sema);
/* We need lock release in process_exit, so we need to acquire (and possibly
wait) for it here to ensure we don't free the lock memory before it is
released in process_exit. */
lock_acquire (&child_result->lock);
/* To prevent waiting for child twice, remove it from the list.
No need to use lock since this is the only thread with access to
the struct process_result now. */
list_remove (&child_result->elem);
int exit_status = child_result->exit_status;
lock_release (&child_result->lock);
free (child_result);
return exit_status;
}
@@ -245,14 +250,21 @@ process_exit (void)
/* Update process result. */
if (cur->result != NULL)
{
lock_acquire (&cur->result->lock);
cur->result->exit_status = cur->exit_status;
/* Parent has died, child has to free the struct process_result * */
if (sema_try_down (&cur->result->sema))
free (cur->result);
{
lock_release (&cur->result->lock);
free (cur->result);
}
/* Parent is still alive and will be the one to free the
struct process_result *, and may be waiting so call sema_up */
else
sema_up (&cur->result->sema);
{
sema_up (&cur->result->sema);
lock_release (&cur->result->lock);
}
}
struct list_elem *e;
@@ -261,12 +273,19 @@ process_exit (void)
{
struct process_result *result
= list_entry (e, struct process_result, elem);
lock_acquire (&result->lock);
/* Child has died (and was not waited for). Free the result. */
if (sema_try_down (&result->sema))
free (result);
{
lock_release (&result->lock);
free (result);
}
/* Child is still alive, signal via sema that parent has died. */
else
sema_up (&result->sema);
{
sema_up (&result->sema);
lock_release (&result->lock);
}
}
/* Destroy the current process's page directory and switch back