Implement ReversePolishStack.evaluate() on current stack with push-back.
Co-Authored-By: td1223
This commit is contained in:
parent
1e84974198
commit
b9dbfb86ad
|
@ -12,4 +12,29 @@ public class ReversePolishStack {
|
|||
public void push(IntOperator intOperator) {
|
||||
stack.push(intOperator);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private int evaluateNext() {
|
||||
if (stack.isEmpty()) {
|
||||
throw new ArithmeticException("No operators to evaluate");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
IntOperator intOperator = stack.pop();
|
||||
Stack<Integer> args = new Stack<>();
|
||||
while (args.size() < intOperator.getOperands()) {
|
||||
if (stack.isEmpty()) {
|
||||
throw new ArithmeticException("Not enough arguments to evaluate operator");
|
||||
}
|
||||
args.push(evaluateNext());
|
||||
}
|
||||
return intOperator.evaluate(args);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public int evaluate() {
|
||||
int result = evaluateNext();
|
||||
if (!stack.isEmpty()) {
|
||||
throw new ArithmeticException("Invalid notation, too many operators");
|
||||
}
|
||||
stack.push(new IntOperator(0, args -> result));
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ import org.junit.Test;
|
|||
|
||||
import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat;
|
||||
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.is;
|
||||
import static org.junit.Assert.fail;
|
||||
|
||||
public class ReversePolishStackTest {
|
||||
final ReversePolishStack reversePolishStack = new ReversePolishStack();
|
||||
|
@ -20,4 +21,34 @@ public class ReversePolishStackTest {
|
|||
reversePolishStack.push(new IntOperator(0, args -> 2));
|
||||
assertThat(reversePolishStack.getSize(), is(2));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void canEvaluateReversePolishStack() {
|
||||
reversePolishStack.push(new IntOperator(0, args -> 10));
|
||||
reversePolishStack.push(new IntOperator(0, args -> 25));
|
||||
reversePolishStack.push(new IntOperator(2, args -> args.get(0) + args.get(1)));
|
||||
assertThat(reversePolishStack.evaluate(), is(35));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void evaluatePushesBack() {
|
||||
reversePolishStack.push(new IntOperator(0, args -> 10));
|
||||
reversePolishStack.push(new IntOperator(0, args -> 25));
|
||||
reversePolishStack.push(new IntOperator(2, args -> args.get(0) + args.get(1)));
|
||||
reversePolishStack.evaluate();
|
||||
assertThat(reversePolishStack.getSize(), is(1));
|
||||
assertThat(reversePolishStack.evaluate(), is(35));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void evaluateThrowsOnInvalidNotation() {
|
||||
reversePolishStack.push(new IntOperator(0, args -> 10));
|
||||
reversePolishStack.push(new IntOperator(0, args -> 25));
|
||||
try {
|
||||
reversePolishStack.evaluate();
|
||||
fail("Expected ArithmeticException to be thrown when too many operators");
|
||||
} catch (ArithmeticException e) {
|
||||
// good
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue